🔗 Share this article

Europe experienced widespread relief on Monday, as the diplomatic emergency triggered by the announcement of a new comprehensive peace framework for ending the war appeared – temporarily – to have been stabilised. A senior US official spoke of "significant advancement" after diplomatic discussions in Geneva. On Monday night, the Kremlin made its response: a renewed assault of rocket attacks on Kyiv.

The Pattern of Negotiation and Warfare

The chain of conflicting incidents captured the bleak nature of the outgoing year. By day, political struggles are waged: positive announcements are delivered from various governments. Immense energy is expended on managing specific proposals. By night, the Kremlin clearly shows the world that, for them, military action persists as the key method for achieving "settlement".

Nocturnal Warfare

As the offensive unfolded into the early hours of Tuesday, the current condition of Ukraine's exposure was revealed. Ukraine is capable of detecting rocket firings from across the border, a capability provided through timely intelligence. From witness perspectives, military aircraft that had been deployed to counter approaching aerial threats streaked across the sky – modern combat jets supplied to Ukraine by NATO members.

Soon thereafter, Kyiv's air-defence systems thundered: multiple launches fired to intercept a hostile projectile. This was a modern interception technology at work, presumably supplied through Western nations. Every firing jolts you unexpectedly, rattling buildings. The instant of fear quickly becomes resigned acknowledgment: maybe the incoming missile won't hit its mark this time, preventing destruction from devastation and additional electricity failures.

Ongoing Risks

Following this, a automatic firearm fired at a drone somewhere nearby, part of a mobile-fire group – almost certainly imported technology. Regrettably, the bullets missed the hostile drone – it continued its flight toward its destination.

Intermittently, this carried on until dawn. Kyiv awoke to the morning news: several casualties, damage and heating outages in many homes as a result of the evening attack. As typically, everyone still went about their day – living the war. But those 24 hours demonstrated Ukraine's critical military reliance on Western support – a reliance that neighboring countries are demonstrably unable to substitute in the short term.

Ineffective Peace Efforts

The comprehensive proposal from American leadership generated strong feelings, controversy and profound anxiety – and temporarily diverted attention from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after earlier high-level meetings and international summits.

Every new proposal from US leadership adheres to the same pattern: a negotiation push against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, manages to fend off. They manage the tension but never actually achieve victory. This trend will, no doubt, persist.

Strategic Calculations

It is convenient to criticize certain parties of repeatedly advocating Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. Washington functions according to a assumption familiar among seasoned negotiators: you cannot achieve through diplomacy what you have lost on the battlefield. The American government assumes that it is unrealistic to force Russia to relinquish the land that it already controls in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The problem is that while recognising this factual reality, US leadership does minimal to discourage Russia, through words or deeds, from thinking that the situation will not shift further in its benefit in the coming year.

Divergent Views

Therefore, Moscow is certain that duration works to their advantage – that Ukraine and its allies are coming close to fatigue. Their motivation to agree to terms that does not give them the maximum possible gain is almost completely absent. There may be numerous efforts to stop fighting, but they will carry on as long as Russia's leader remains highly assured in the outcome.

On the contrary, Kyiv believes that Ukraine can still endure, gradually sacrificing people and territory but preventing a total frontline collapse until conditions improve in its favour.

Existing Situation

Realistically, there are no real preconditions for a armistice. Now, individual motivations are becoming relevant: leadership ambitions to broker a ceasefire and secure international recognition, and Ukrainian leadership's dual difficulties – on one hand, not to alienate a key ally, and on the other, to unite the population around the national cause against any initiative Kyiv finds unacceptable, so that their attention does not shift toward internal issues. And although their objective will now be significantly challenging after recent developments, it remains very improbable that this will modify their basic position.

These opposing factors are driving the talks.

Conclusion and Outlook

It took a just a single week to eliminate the 28 points of the latest plan. Aggressive and erratic handling of the matter by Washington, resistance by Ukraine and the rest of Europe, along with pacifying measures of diplomats, and finally, current information leaks, all achieved their purpose.

While new plans based on old ideas are imminent, Kyiv, London and other European capitals should draw one fundamental conclusion: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to resist negotiation assaults from Washington that are founded on Moscow's terms and show certain reluctance to modify developments, if they maintain solidarity and improve their protective measures at a significantly accelerated rate. If they do, neither political nor armed coercion will be able to break them. In the meantime, Ukraine's ability to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the predictable period, largely rely on sustained allied backing.