🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves looking for treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier killed while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for more sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit burials to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is accountable.”

A local official said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of hallowed earth.