🔗 Share this article

A digital rights organization has claimed to have harvested a vast number of songs from Spotify and is getting ready to publish them publicly.

Potential Boost for AI Training

Industry experts said the seeming leak could aid artificial intelligence firms looking for material to develop their technology.

A group called Anna’s Archive reported it had scraped 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million entries of associated data such as artist and album names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million songs, stated that the leak did not constitute its entire inventory.

“We have identified and deactivated the malicious user accounts that were involved in unlawful scraping,” said a Spotify spokesperson.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, further explained that an inquiry into unauthorised access identified a external actor scraped public metadata and used questionable tactics to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Declared Mission and Concerns

Spotify does not believe the audio taken by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is known for providing links to pirated books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘preservation archive’ for music.

The group asserted the audio files accounted for 99.6% of all music listened to by its listeners and would be distributed via ‘torrents’, a means of sharing large digital files online.

“Of course Spotify doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic beginning,” commented Anna’s Archive, which frames its purpose as “safeguarding humanity’s knowledge and culture”.

AI Training and Intellectual Property Battleground

A composer and campaigner for protecting artists’ rights, said the leaked music would likely be used for training artificial intelligence systems.

“Educating models on illegally sourced data is unfortunately common in the tech sector, so this stolen music is highly likely to be used training AI models,” he said.

The group's website makes references to a large online archive, a vast online repository of pirated books that has reportedly been leveraged by the parent company of Facebook to develop its AI models.

The co-founder of an AI startup posted on the professional network that members of the public could in theory “create their own personal free version of the service”. The executive said it could also enable technology firms to “educate models on contemporary music at a large volume”.

Intellectual property law has become a battleground between artists, authors and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Considerations and Responses

Across Britain, artists and writers have raised concerns against a government suggestion to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without permission unless the owner opts out. Virtually every participant to a government consultation on the idea has backed artists’ apprehensions.

The secretary of state for science, innovation and technology told parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, adding that ministers would “use the time to get this right”. The government has pledged to make policy proposals on AI and copyright by March 2025.